BANK LENDING OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES: ECONOMIC NATURE AND PRINCIPLES OF ITS REALIZATION
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract. Industrial enterprises and banks operate in the conditions of modern realities which reflect the consequences
of prolonged socio-economic and political instability. Industrial sector of economy is the object of strategically
importance of the state development in developed countries all over the world. At the same time, the
industrial sector of economy is tended to be very sensitive to any fluctuations in the both financial and commodity
markets, as well as to changing scenarios in the socio-economic and political environments. There are
also a number of essential obstacles that hinder development of the former Soviet Union industrial enterprises’
productive and economic potential. Here is some of it: outdated material and technical base, lack of innovative
technologies, lack of their own financial resources, high level of energy consumption, poor understanding
of the ecology policy issue or its absence, and so on. Such a state reduces the chances of successful development
of industrial enterprises’ productive and economic potential significantly. One of the efficient and forceful
ways of improvement of overall socio-economic situation in the country is development, stable support and
modernization of industrial enterprises on the basis of mutually beneficial cooperation of banks’ and industrial
enterprises’ capitals. A special role in these processes should be given to a variety of instruments of financial and
credit markets. One of these instruments is a bank lending to industrial enterprises. Herewith, the main accent
should be made on the role of bank lending to industrial enterprises. Since any elaboration of subject first of all
requires a strong opinion of its economic nature, the term «bank lending to industrial enterprises» is researched
in this issue, as well as specific principles of bank lending to industrial enterprises.
Keywords: industry, industrial enterprise, loan, lending to enterprises, lending to industrial enterprises, bank
lending to industrial enterprises.
JEL Classification G21, E51, P42
Formulas: 0; fig.: 2; tabl.: 0; bibl.: 21.
Article Details
How to Cite
References
Deineko, L.V., Yakubovskyi, M.M., & Sheludko, E.I. (2014).Promyslovapolitykapostkryzovoiekonomiky[Industrial policy of post¬crisis economy]. Kyiv: DU «In-t ekon. ta prohnoz. NAN Ukrainy». Retrieved fromhttp://ief.org.ua/docs/mg/253.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Tarasova, N.V., Klymenko, L.P., & Yemelianov, V.M. (et al.). (2011). Promyslovist Ukrainy: tendentsii, problemy, perspektyvy [Industry of Ukraine: tendencies, problems, prospects]. Mykolaiv: Vyd-vo ChDU im. Petra Mohyly. Retrieved fromhttps://lib.chmnu.edu.ua/pdf/monograf/52/3.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Fedoseeva, V.A. (2018). Ekonomika organizacii (predpriyatiya) [Economics of the organization (enterprise)]. Perm. Retrieved fromhttp://www.psu.ru/files/docs/science/books/uchebnie-posobiya/fedoseeva-economika-organizacii.pdf [in Russian].
Vyshnevskyi, V. P., Zanizdra, M. Yu., & Shchetylova, T. V. (et al.). (2019). Smart-promyslovist: napriamy stanovlennia, problemy i rishennia [Smart¬industry: directions of formation, problems and solutions]. Kyiv: NAN Ukrainy, Instytut ekonomiky promyslovosti. Retrieved fromhttps://iie.org.ua/monografiyi/smart-promislovist-naprjami-stanovlennja-problemi-i-rishennja [in Ukrainian].
Chumak, H.M. (2008). Obgruntuvanniaskladovykhorhanizatsiino-ekonomichnohomekhanizmuupravlinniaekoloho-ekonomichnoiudiialnistiupromyslovohopidpryiemstva [Substantiationofthecomponentsoftheorganizationalandeconomicmechanismofmanagementofecologicalandeconomicactivityofanindustrial enterprise]. Nauchno-tekhnicheskij sbornik. Ekonomicheskie nauki — Scientific and technical collection. Economic sciences, 83, 90—96. Retrievedfromhttps://core.ac.uk/reader/11317119[in Ukrainian].
Shyshkina, O. (2020). Klasyfikatsiiapromyslovykhpidpryiemstvukontekstiupravlinniafinansovymyry-zykamy [Classification of industrial enterprises in the context of financial risk management]. Halytskyi eko¬nomichnyi visnyk — Galician Economic Bulletin, 2 (63), 164—175. Retrieved fromhttps://galicianvisnyk.tntu.edu.ua/pdf/63/819.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Kunin, V.A. (2011) Upravlenie riskami promyshlennogo predprinimatel’stva (teoriya, metodologiya, prak¬tika) [Risk management of industrial entrepreneurship (theory, methodology, practice)]. Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskoj akademii upravleniya i ekonomiki. Retrieved fromhttps://www.spbume.ru/file/pages/79/kunin2011.pdf [in Russian].
Dziubliuk, O.V., & Makhalova, O.L. (2008). Banky i pidpryiemstva: kredytni aspekty vzaiemodii v umovakh transformatsii ekonomiky [Banks and enterprises: credit aspects of interaction in the conditions of economic transformation]. Ternopil: Vektor. Retrieved fromhttp://dspace.wunu.edu.ua/bitstream/316497/526/1/kredytni_aspekty_vzaemodii.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Lahutin, V. D. (2002). Kredytuvannia: teoriia i praktyka [Lending: theory and practice]. Kyiv: Znannia [in Ukrainian].
Kovalenko, D.I., & Vehner, V.V. (2013). Finansy, hroshi ta kredyt: teoriia ta praktyka [Finance, money and loans: theory and practice]. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury [in Ukrainian].
Hlushchenko, S.V. (2015). Hroshi. Kredyt. Kredytnyi rynok [Money. Credit. Credit market]. Ky i v : NaUKMA [in Ukrainian].
Hurova, K. D., Shelest, O. L., & Kolupaieva, I. V. (2015). Finansy, hroshi ta kredyt [Finance, money and credit].Kharkiv: Svit Knyh [in Ukrainian].
Belohlazova, H.N. (2009). Den’gi. Kredit. Banki [Money. Credit. Banks]. Moscow: Vysshee obrazovanie [in Russian].
Glass and Goldberg. (2020). The difference between industrial and commercial banks. Retrieved fromhttps://glassgoldberg.com/2020/02/24/the-difference-between-industrial-and-commercial-banks.
Paranytsia, N.V. (2011). Osoblyvosti vzaiemodii bankiv i promyslovykh pidpryiemstv[Features of the interaction of banks and industrial enterprises]. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu DPS Ukrainy — Scientific Bulletin of the National University of the State Tax Service of Ukraine, 4 (55), 89—95. Retrieved fromhttp://ir.nusta.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/doc/1542/1/688_IR.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Smolinska, S.D., & Samchenkova, I.O. (2018). Shliakhy pokrashchennia zdiisnennia kredytnykh ope-ratsii bankamy u napriami pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti diialnosti pidpryiemstv [Ways to improve the implementation of credit operations by banks in the direction of improving the efficiency of enterprises]. Molodyi vchenyi — A young scientist, 10 (62), 885—888. Retrieved fromhttps://financial.lnu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/203.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Dziubliuk, O. (2002). Intehratsiia bankivskoho ta promyslovoho kapitaliv i kredytni vidnosyny [Integra-tion of banking and industrial capital and credit relations]. Finansy, podatky i pravo — Finance, taxes and law, 10, 11—17. Retrieved fromhttp://dspace.wunu.edu.ua/handle/316497/17701 [in Ukrainian].
Chubaj, V., & Tesak, O. (2013). Financial relationships between commercial banks and industrial en-terprises: the principles of organizing and risks. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie¬Sklodowska Lublin¬Polonia, Vol. XLVII, 4, 15—24. Retrieved fromhttps://journals.umcs.pl/h/article/viewFile/1541/1223.
Granstone, R. (2002). Principles of Banking Law. Edition 2. Great Britain, Norfolk: Biddies Ltd, King’s Lynn. Retrieved fromhttps://www.modares.ac.ir/uploads/En-Law.Book.3.pdf.
Shull, B. (1991). The separation of banking and commerce in the United States: an examination of prin-cipal issues. Washington, D.C. ,U.S.: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Retrieved fromhttp://link.library.in.gov/portal/The-separation-of-banking-and-commerce-in-the/A-T34x0yIKk.
Ezangina, I. E., Zhilina, V. I., & Samoshkina, M. V. (2016). Rol’ keptivnyh finansovyh struktur v denezhnyh potokah sovremennogo biznesa [The role of captive financial structures in the cash flows of modern busi-ness]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo — Economy and entrepreneurship, 8, 268—273. Retrieved fromhttps://ies.unitech-mo.ru/files/upload/publications/15789/c4bfe64e91cdb2670b9ca8357d8e33eb.pdf[in Russian].
