METAPROGRAM APPROACH IN THE PROCESS OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF PERSONNEL IN FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of the article is to deepen the theoretical foundations and develop practical recommendations for the use of meta-program approach in the selection and evaluation of personnel in domestic financial institutions. The article summarizes various approaches to the definition of «metaprogram» in the field of personnel management and proposes its own definition of this category; the place and value of metaprograms in the job profile are determined; a standard metaprogram profile of the position of a financial institution risk management specialist is proposed and recommendations are provided for building a competency interview and interpreting its results in order to identify relevant metaprograms of an employee or candidate for this position. It has been proven that the main condition for successful detection of metaprograms in the interview process
is the use of the right questions and the correct interpretation of answers to them, which helps to identify stable deep psychological attitudes that determine human perception of objective reality and response to organizational methods. Metaprograms are a kind of filter of information coming from objective reality to human consciousness through the senses, turning it into subjective perception and the corresponding reactions associated with it. The use of a metaprogram approach in assessing a person’s suitability for the position, along with classical, traditional methods, avoids errors in the selection and evaluation of staff. Defining and taking into account employee metaprograms is also the key to more effective management. In addition, it allows him to find a job in which he will be most effective, and the activity itself, in accordance with the internal attitudes of the employee, will bring him maximum pleasure. Taking into account metaprograms allows you to use adequate tools to stimulate work, gives an understanding of the causes of certain interpersonal relationships in the team, helps prevent conflicts and high staff turnover.
Keywords: metaprogram, human resources management, personnel, financial institution, job profile.
JEL Classification M12, M51, G21
Formulas: 0; fig.: 1; tabl.: 1; bibl.: 16.
Article Details
How to Cite
References
Lilly, J. (1968). Programming and Metaprogramming in the Human Biocomputer: Theory and Experi-ments. New York: The Julian Press. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/programmingmetap-00lill_0/page/n3/mode/2up.
Makota, T.V. (2012). Vykorystannia metaprohram u roboti z kadramy [The use of metaprograms in work-ing with staff ]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav — Scientific Bul¬letin of Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, 2, 426—433 [in Ukrainian].
Cameron-Bandler, L. (1968). Know How: Guided Programs for Inventing Your Own Best Future. San Rafael: Futurepace.
Charvet, S. (1997). Words That Change Minds. Dubuque: Kendall / Hunt Publishing Company.
James, T., & Woodsmall, W. (1988). Time Line Therapy and The Basis of Personality. Bancyfelin: Crown House Publishing.
Furduescu, B. (2019). NLP tοοls and prοsesses of mοtivatiοn. HOLISTICA,10, 2, 39—50.
Dilts, R., & Delozier, J. (2000). Encyclopedia of Systemic NLP and NLP New Coding. Scotts Valley: NLP Univercity Press.
Pangrikar, A. (n. d.). Metaprograms in Human Resource Management. Linkedin. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/metaprograms-human-resource-management-dr-ashwini-pangrikar.
Gajduchenko, K. (2018). Metaprogrammy dlya biznes¬praktikov. Sovremennye instrumenty ponimaniya ly¬udej i vliyaniya na nih [Metaprograms for business practitioners. Modern tools for understanding people and influencing them]. Ky i v: Izdatel’stvo Rostislava Burlaki [in Russian].
Shipunov, S.A. (2009). Podbor personala na osnove analiza metaprogrammnogo portreta cheloveka. Zo¬lotye rossypi sovremennogo NLP [Selection of personnel based on the analysis of the metaprogram portrait of a person. Gold placers of modern NLP]. Mosсow: Tvoi Knigi [in Russian].
Patrick, E. (2005). Moving Metaprograms Beyond Flatland: Metaprogram Research by Patrick E.C. Mer-levede. MSc. of jobEQ. Retrieved from https://jobeq.com/articles/beyond_flatland.pdf.
Hall, M., & Bodenhamer, B. (2007). 51 metaprogramma NLP. Prognozirovanie povedeniya, «chtenie» myslej, ponimanie motivov [51 NLP Metaprogram. Predicting behavior, «reading» thoughts, understanding motives]. Saint Petersburg: PrajmEVROZNAK [in Russian].
Vnutrishnia i zovnishnia referentsiia [Internal and external reference]. (n. d.). Psykholohis — Psychology. Retrieved from http://psychologis.com.ua/vnutrennyaya_i_vneshnyaya_referenciya.htm [in Ukrainian].
Fadeeva, I. V. (2017). Metaprogrammy dlya podbora personala [Metaprograms for selection of person-nel]. Blog Iriny Fadeevoj — Blog of Irina Fadeeva. Retrieved from http://www.fadeeva.kiev.ua/metapro-grammy-dlya-podbora-personala.html [in Russian].
Karpov, A. V., & Filippova, Yu. V. (2018). Tekhnologii metaprogrammnogo interv’yu v praktike otbora personala biznes-organizacij [Metaprogram interview technologies in the practice of personnel selection in business organizations]. Journal of Modern Competition, Vol. 12, 2 (68)—3 (69) [in Russian].
Kachalova, N. S. (2008). Metaprohramy — mystetstvo zadavaty pytannia [Metaprograms are the art of asking questions]. HR Liga — HR League. Retrieved from https://hrliga.com/index.php?module=profession&op=view&id=985 [in Ukrainian].
