DISTINGUISHING MEDIATED PERFORMANCE OF A CRIMINAL OFFENSE AND COMPLICATION IN A CRIMINAL OFFENSE

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: 2023-06-30
Тест плагіна: Дату в логах не знайдено
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55643/ser.2.48.2023.500
Keywords:
Complicity in a criminal offense, indirect execution of a criminal offense, separation of acts, common subject, real subject, the directedness of intent, carelessness

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 48 (2023): SOCIO-ECONOMIC RELATIONS IN THE DIGITAL SOCIETY

Section

Legal and regulatory requirements and its impact on socio-economic development of global digital society
How to Cite
Omelchuk, O., & Zakharchuk, V. (2023). DISTINGUISHING MEDIATED PERFORMANCE OF A CRIMINAL OFFENSE AND COMPLICATION IN A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. Socio-Economic Relations in the Digital Society, 2(48), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.55643/ser.2.48.2023.500
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction of the content in any medium, providing that the original author and source are credited.

Main Article Content

Oleh Omelchuk
D.Sc. in Law, Professor, Rector of the Khmelnytskyi University of Management and Law named after Leonid Yuzkov, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine , д.ю.н., професор, ректор Хмельницького університету управління та права імені Леоніда Юзькова, Хмельницький, Україна
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4057-380X
Viktor Zakharchuk
Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure, Khmelnytskyi University of Management and Law named after Leonid Yuzkov, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine , к.ю.н., доцент кафедри кримінального права та процесу, Хмельницький університет управління та права імені Леоніда Юзькова, Хмельницький, Україна

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to distinguish between the indirect execution of a criminal offense and complicity in a criminal offense. This is due to the fact that in judicial practice there are quite a lot of cases when the objective side of a criminal offense is committed by several persons, but only one of them (the indirect executor) acts culpably, and other persons are misled about the true nature of their actions. It is also common for criminals to use persons who have not reached the age of criminal responsibility for the indirect execution of a criminal offense, especially when committing self-interested criminal offenses against property. The concept of such mediated performance was studied, its system was defined, and typical methods of its execution were characterized. The judicial practice of qualifying the indirect execution of a criminal offense by using persons who are not the subjects of a criminal offense, the use of persons who have the characteristics of a common subject of a criminal offense, but act innocently, or who act under the influence of irresistible physical or mental coercion, has been analyzed. The common and distinguishing features of the indirect execution of a criminal offense and complicity in it are given, and the main criteria that must be taken into account for making such a distinction are established. It is established that the indirect execution of a criminal offense will be provided that the objective side of the criminal offense is not executed by the guilty person either in whole or in part. After all, if a person performs at least a certain part of the objective side, then he acts as an executor (co-executor) of the act, and not as an indirect executor of it.

Article Details

How to Cite

Omelchuk, O., & Zakharchuk, V. (2023). DISTINGUISHING MEDIATED PERFORMANCE OF A CRIMINAL OFFENSE AND COMPLICATION IN A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. Socio-Economic Relations in the Digital Society, 2(48), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.55643/ser.2.48.2023.500

References

Aidynyan, A. A. (2015). Factual mistakes of an accomplice regarding the circumstances of the committed crime and the subject of the crime regarding the circumstances that correspond to signs of complicity: impact on criminal-legal qualification. Law and civil society, 1, 116-141. https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/lib/28110/1/ВРАХУВАННЯ%20ФАКТИЧНОЇ%20ПОМИЛКИ%20ЩОДО%20ВЧИНЕННЯ.pdf

Verdict of the October District Court of the city of Mariupol, Donetsk region, in case No 1-кп/263/166/2014. (2014 March 7). https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/37519570

Verdict of the Krasyliv District Court of the Khmelnytskyi Region dated, in case No 2209/2324/12. (2012, November 22). https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/28388367

Hryshchuk, V. K. (2019). Criminal law of Ukraine: General part: teaching. manual. Lviv, 667 p.

Criminal law and legislation of Ukraine. General part: course of lectures. Kyiv, 432 р.

Kuznetsov, V. V. (2007). The theory of the qualification of crimes: a textbook on general ed. E.M. Moiseeva, O.M. Juzhy. Kyiv, 300 p.

Navrotsky, V. O. (2006). Fundamentals of criminal law qualification: teaching. мanual. Kyiv, 704 р.

On judicial practice in cases of crimes against life and health of a person: Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine of February 7, No 2. (2003). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0002700-03#Text

On judicial practice in cases of crimes against property: resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Ukraine dated November 6, No 10. (2009). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0010700-09#Text

Hristova, Yu. V. (2016). Actual issues of intermediate commission of a crime. Scientific Bulletin of the Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, 1, 309‒316.

Honcharenko, V. H. (2013). Zasady verkhovenstva prava ta zakonnosti kryminalnoho provadzhennia v plani zdiisnennia zakhystu. Visnyk Akademii advokatury Ukrainy, 3(28), 6‒7. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vaau_2013_3_3

Horodovenko, V.V. (2006). Problemy nezalezhnosti sudovoi vlady: avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.10 / Nats. yuryd. un-t im. Yaroslava Mudroho. Kharkiv. http://www.disslib.org/problemy-nezalezhnosti-sudovoyi-vlady.html

Lavrova, V. V. (2019). Problemy realizatsii verkhovenstva prava v kryminalnomu provadzhenni. Pryvatne i publichne pravo, 3, 105‒110. https://doi.org/ 10.32845/2663-5666.2019.3.23

Panova, A. V. (2016). Vyznannia dokaziv nedopustymy u kryminalnomu provadzhenni : dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Nats. yuryd. un-t im. Yaroslava Mudroho. Kharkiv. https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/12538/1/Panova_2016.pdf

Pozhar, V. H. (2013). Shchodo terminolohichnoho vyznachennia katehorii «subiekty kryminalnoho provadzhennia» ta yoho spivvidnoshennia z sumizhnymy poniattiamy. Pravove zhyttia suchasnoi Ukrainy: materialy mizhnar. nauk. konf. prof.-vykl. Skladu. Natsion. un-t «Odeska yurydychna akademiia». Odesa: Feniks. http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/8249?show=full

Strashok, A. A. (2021). Vidpovidalnist svidka u kryminalnomu provadzhenni. Aktualni doslidzhennia pravovoi ta istorychnoi nauky: materialy mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. internet-konf, 36, 16–19. https://nauka.nlu.edu.ua/nauka/download/diss/strashok/d_strashok.pdf.p7s

Strashok, A. A. (2021). Protsesualnyi status eksperta u kryminalnomu provadzhenni. Visegrad Journal on Human Rights, 4, 209–214.

Tsuvina, T. A. (2019). Nezalezhnist ta neuperedzhenist sudu yak skladovi verkhovenstva prava u tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi. Teoriia i praktyka pravoznavstva, 16 (2). http://tlaw.nlu.edu.ua/article/view/186025

Zinchenko, I. A. (2013). Participation in a Crime According to the Criminal Law of the Ukraine-England: a Comparative Legal Aspect. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Iurydychna akademiia Ukrainy imeni Yaroslava Mudroho», 3(14), 205-216. http://econtlaw.nlu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/3-205-216.pdf

Saakian, M.B. (2016). Provokatsiia: kryminalno-pravovyi aspekt. Rol ta mistse pravookhoronnykh orhaniv u rozbudovi demokratychnoi pravovoi derzhavy : materialy VIII Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. Odessa: ODUVS, 326-327/247. http://dspace.oduvs.edu.ua/handle/123456789/639

Savchenko, A. V. (2007). Kryminalne zakonodavstvo Ukrainy ta federalne kryminalne zakonodavstvo Spoluchenykh Shtativ Ameryky: kompleksne porivnialno-pravove doslidzhennia: monohrafiia. Kyiv: KNT.