ASSESSMENT OF STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN THE FIELD OF SECURITY DEVELOPMENT OF THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR
Article Sidebar
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction of the content in any medium, providing that the original author and source are credited.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article analyzes the features of choosing the optimal strategic direction for increasing the effectiveness of public-private partnership mechanisms in the field of security development of the agricultural sector in the context of modern challenges and threats. The study covers two main strategic directions (D1 and D2), which are considered from the perspective of potential benefits, costs, opportunities and risks. The basis of the methodological toolkit is the BOCR method, which makes it possible to assess not only the benefits and costs but also the risks and prospects for the development of selected strategic solutions. In the process of applying the BOCR approach, evaluation criteria were formed for each element (B - benefits, O - opportunities, C - costs, R - risks) and pairwise comparisons were conducted, which made it possible to determine the weight of each criterion. In parallel, the consistency of expert assessments was calculated by calculating the consistency ratio, which confirmed the relevance and reliability of the results obtained. According to the results of the assessment procedures, it was established that the direction of forming a mechanism for in-depth technological cooperation and accelerating digital transformation (D2) has a higher global priority despite the higher level of risks and higher costs. This is due to the fact that the D2 strategy, in addition to expanding innovative opportunities, contributes to the creation of favourable conditions for the implementation of advanced technologies, and infrastructure development and attracting more investors to projects in the agricultural sector. In parallel, D2 meets the needs of security development in the war and post-war periods, proposing the creation of comprehensive mechanisms for cooperation and accelerating adaptation to global challenges.
Article Details
How to Cite
References
Akomea-Frimpong, I., Jin, X., Osei-Kyei, R., & Tumpa, R.J. (2023). A critical review of public–private partnerships in the COVID-19 pandemic: key themes and future research agenda. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 12(4), 701-720. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-01-2022-0009
Cepparulo, A., Eusepi, G., & Giuriato, L. (2020). Public Finances and Public Private Partnerships in the European Union. MPRA Paper. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/103918
Hrytsenko, L., Boarko, I., Tverezovska, O., Polcyn, J., & Miskiewicz, R. (2021). Risk-Management of Public-Private Partnership Projects. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 155-165. http://nbuv.gov.ua/ujrn/mimi_2021_2_15
Jakaitis, J., Paliulis, N. K., & Meidutė, I. (2011). Public-private partnerships: Perspective of city’s territories development. Business: Theory and Practice, 12(3), 246-257. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2011.25
Jayasena, N.S., Chan, D. W. M., Kumaraswamy, M.M., & Saka, A.B. (2023). Applicability of public-private partnerships in smart infrastructure development: the case of Hong Kong. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(11), 1932-1944. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2027076
Khmel, V., & Zhao, S. (2016). Arrangement of financing for highway infrastructure projects under the conditions of Public-Private Partnership. IATSS Research, 39, 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2015.05.002
Kruglov, V. (2021). Development of a public-private partnership system in modern conditions. Scientific Bulletin: Public Administration, 3, 50-67. http://nbuv.gov.ua/ujrn/nauvisdu_2021_3_5
Kushneruk, A., & Alekseienko, N. (2020). Agreement of the economic interests of the state and the private capital in public-private partnership projects. Economics and state, 5, 187-191. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6806.2020.5.187
Kuznetsova, A., & Maslov, V. (2021). Methodological principles of analysis of the concept of “organizational and economic mechanism of public-private partnership”. Bulletin of the economy, 3, 137-146. http://nbuv.gov.ua/ujrn/vtneu_2021_3_12
Kuznyetsova, A., Klipkova, O., & Maslov, V. (2022). Methodology of evaluation of performance of public-private partnership projects. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 6(41), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v6i41.251466
Lasa, Y. M., Takim, R., & Ahmad, N. (2018). Sources of Financing for Public Private Partnership Projects: Lesson Learnt from Malaysia. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 11(20), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i20/123350
Liu, J., Love, P. E., Smith, J., Regan, M., & Davis, P. R. (2015). Life cycle critical success factors for public–private partnership infrastructure projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(5), 04014073. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000307
Megawati, S., Alfarizi, M., & Syamsul, M.R. (2024). Key advantages of the green government initiative in achieving local public service performance and sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(11), 4361-4375. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.191124
Orshanska, M. I. (2019). Attracting foreign direct investment in the infrastructure of Ukraine under the conditions of public-private partnership. Scientific Bulletin of NLTU of Ukraine, 29(9), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.36930/40290919
Podolyan, Yu. O., & Ivashchenko, A. V. (2021). Comparative analysis of the state and prospects of public-private partnership development in Ukraine and the European Union. Dictum Factum, 2, 92-97. http://nbuv.gov.ua/ujrn/dicf_2021_2_14
Shkurenko, O. V. (2021). Public-Private Partnership as a Toolkit of Theater Balance of a Circular Economy Model: Scientific Picture Aspects. Economic Bulletin of the Dnieper Polytechnic, 1, 236-246. http://nbuv.gov.ua/ujrn/evngu_2021_1_26
Shuliuk, B. (2021). Corporate Financing of Public-Private Partnership Projects: Assessment of Financial Opportunities and Risks. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 3, 78-85. http://nbuv.gov.ua/ujrn/fkd_2021_3_10
State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2025). https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/
Tian, B., Wang, Z., Li, C., & Fu, J. (2023). Can relational governance improve sustainability in public-private partnership infrastructure projects? An empirical study based on structural equation modeling. Engineering, Construction and Archi-tectural Management, 30(1), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2021-0333
Zhang, S., Leiringer, R., & Winch, G. (2023). Procuring infrastructure public-private partnerships: capability development and learning from an owner perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 42(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2023.2235439